"Itching Ears in
the Making"
2
Tim 4:2-5 3 “For the time will come
when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own
desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what
their itching ears want to hear. 4 They
will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. 5 But you, keep your head in all
situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the
duties of your ministry.” NIV
There
are times in ministry when pastors are required to take a doctrinal stand for
the protection of the saints from the deceptions of the Satan. Pastors cannot live by or minister on the
basis of what is easy. We must be
constantly on guard, a 24 hour of sentry duty, arresting any hint of heresy and
apostasy. I am writing this because a
great error has been made by one of the great evangelical leaders of era, Billy
Graham. In addition to Dr. Graham, his
evangelical association and son, Franklin Graham have participated in this act
of apostasy.
“The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association removed language labeling
Mormonism a "cult" from its website after the famed preacher met with
Republican nominee Mitt Romney last week and pledged to help his presidential
campaign. Ken Barun, the BGEA's chief of
staff, confirmed the removal on Tuesday…Our primary focus at the Billy Graham
Evangelistic Association has always been promoting the Gospel of Jesus
Christ," Barun said in a statement. "We removed the information from
the website because we do not wish to participate in a theological debate about
something that has become politicized during this campaign." (Religious
News Services, by Daniel Burke)
This action is not insignificant. The “cleansing” of the website of Mormonism
as a cult is an intentional act to undermine the Doctrine of the Gospel of
Jesus Christ to achieve a political compromise.
To deny the Gospel of Jesus Christ is not heresy alone, it constitutes
apostasy.
Christian
Apologetics and Research Ministry states the following: “Apostasy means to fall away from the truth. Therefore, an
apostate is someone who has once believed and then rejected the truth of God.
Apostasy is a rebellion against God because it is a rebellion against truth. In
the Old Testament God warned the Jewish people about their idolatry and their
lack of trust in Him. In the New
Testament the epistles warn us about not falling away from the truth. Apostasy
is a very real and dangerous threat.”
The act of apostasy is significantly different from an
error of heresy. Heresy is the denial or
doubt of a core doctrinal statement. In
contrast, apostasy is the abandonment of the whole truth/doctrine. My charge of apostasy is because of the magnitude
of error in the cultic doctrine of Mormonism.
The
basic tenets of the Christian faith stand on God’s grace and all its benefits. Mormonism denies each one and teaches against
each one. I have been studying the
doctrines of the Mormon Church and my heart is broken for the people in
Mormonism. I have been working through
the book titled: Speaking the Truth in Love to Mormons by Mark J. Cares. (I
encourage the purchase of this book) Based
on this book and its contrasting of the two doctrines, there can be no
relationship, more directly, no tolerance for the Doctrine of Mormonism.
The
point of conflict for me is Dr. Graham’s readiness to place a veil over the
doctrines of Mormonism for political purposes.
As an evangelist, Dr. Graham has turned his back on the truth. The differences between the two doctrines are
too great to find any common ground. There
is not even a simple thread of commonality between the two doctrines. Dr. Graham may have found Governor Romney to
be an ethical man in the spectrum of the world, but in relation to the two
doctrines there remains a great spiritual divide between the two that cannot be
denied by removing the “cult” reference to Mormonism from the website. The "theological/political debate" response to media
inquiries is a dishonest excuse for the action to remove the “cult” reference.
There
are “itching ears” in the ‘Billy Graham Evangelical Association.” They have heard a political message that is
soothing to their ears. I understand the
conflict with cultural values. But our
conflict with the culture is not because of the failings of sinners. Culture conflict is born of our failings as
the body of Christ. Too often we
compromised and have failed to be salt and light! The conflict(s) with our culture is because
we have chosen a political process over the leadership and authority of the
Holy Spirit. It is easier to impose
righteousness through the legislative process than to live righteously, to be
light, and to be salt. Christianity
today would rather consume sinners through legislation rather than embrace
sinners through the love of God.
Dr.
Graham and the association could have acknowledged a political affinity with
Gov. Romney. But maybe that is the
problem, how do people of light have fellowship with darkness. Dr. Graham should have embraced Gov. Romney
on the basis of the political perspective.
I can only assume that Gov. Romney was seeking a political bond and not
a spiritual bond. Romney, as a Mormon,
could never have a spiritual relationship with Dr. Graham unless Dr. Graham
disavowed his faith in God and embraced the” exalted human gods” of
Mormonism. So why did Dr. Graham,
Franklin Graham, and the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association disavowed their
faith? I suspect itching ears.
When we vote on Tuesday, know we are participating in a
system of governance that is worldly and not of God. There is no democracy in the Bible. God’s governance for the Kngdom of God is
Jesus Christ as Lord of lords, King of kings and the leadership and authority
of the Holy Spirit. And upon the return of Christ, He shall be the rule of the
whole earth, not a single contrived political governance will survive. As Christians, we are not free, we were
bought with a price and therefore we have become the servants of God, the
children of God, the ambassadors of Christ, we are bond-servants and slaves to
Christ, and ultimately joint-heirs with Christ.
There is a greater reward for the citizens of the Kingdom of God, an
everlasting reward that awaits us.
Let
us enter the voting booth in humility; be careful not to gloat saying or
thinking “I am doing my Christian thing.”
Do not say “I am voting for person “a” or “b” because they support my
Christian values.” Both candidates have
serious ethical problems. Let us be
honest, we participate because we want to be included, so we compromise and
choose between the “lesser of two evils.”
Is this really our Christian duty, to choose between the lesser of two
evils? May God forgive our unbelief!
Grace Alone!
Good morning Steve,
ReplyDeleteI too have been broken with this election. Far too many posts on Facebook by folks claiming to be Christian Republicans, or Christian Democrats, most often while never uttering a word of connection to Christ, or our eternal focus. I did read one well written blog post which I've tried unsuccessfully to send to you that articulated well the position I think we should take, and the biblical references for it. Its essential point was that we must remember that as Christians we are connected to the eternal by the Cross, and thus the temporal, elections for example, are something that will not change our ultimate future. However, this poster encouraged each of us, as inspired by our understanding of the values and policies of those running for office, and as those values resonated with our understanding of our own personal calling and walk, to vote our conscience.
While this might strike us as a compromise position, I think it helps me get above the noise, particularly of those who would want me to vote one way or another based upon my Christian Faith. This blogger helped me think about my faith as being above my politic and above Politics.
On the matter of apostasy, while I understand where you're going, and agree that a number of us are left scratching our heads by the attempted connection between the "Christian Right" and Romney, I consider it pure politics, and nothing spiritual. Dr. Graham's posting doesn't change my concerns regarding Mr. Romney's religious background at all, and I fully expect that they haven't changed many within the Christian Right.
I agree that we should consider ourselves Ambassadors of Christ, and as such we should face Tuesday with prayerful hearts, choosing to participate as is our right, following the leading of the Spirit within each of us.
Hello Bill, I really appreciate your contribution. I am very interested in the blogger you have identified in your comment. I am still wrestling with this in a very serious way. I certainly would appreciate any scriptual insight you might have or the blogger you referred to. I hate it when I am called to serve God in these conflicting circumstances without adequate wisdom. I have always been able to exercise my duty to my country with a clear heart before God. This time I am so frustrated. I just want God to be loved, respected and honored by my choices. So I am really open to any wisdom you might have to share with me.
DeleteHi Steve,
ReplyDeleteWell I'll try and duplicate the ur here:
http://jenhammer.com/blog/2012/10/16/the-election-thoughts-from-a-christian-independent#UH6F-izCTII.twitter
I hope that works. A caviat; I don't buy that one can claim independence here. I believe the Holy Spirit leads us, and to your point, I believe He leads us up, not towards the lesser of two evils, but in the direction of our growing understanding of His role for us in the Transformation of His Kingdom. Hope that UR works and that it helps!
Bill
Hi Steve,
ReplyDeleteI tried this yesterday, but it apparently either didn't work, or wasn't 'approved.' I'll try once more! A cautionary note; this believer is not a seminarian, but I like her faithfulness. I disagree with her independent position politically, because I believe we have to chose. Hope this helps.
Bill
http://jenhatmaker.com/blog/2012/10/16/the-election-thoughts-from-a-christian-independent#.UH6F-lzCTlI.twitter